"I feel like a real chemist right now": Epistemic affect in the chemistry laboratory

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

"I feel like a real chemist right now" : Epistemic affect in the chemistry laboratory. / Agustian, Hendra Y.; Gammelgaard, Bente; Rangkuti, Muhammad Aswin; Niemann, Jonas.

I: Science Education, 03.2024.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Agustian, HY, Gammelgaard, B, Rangkuti, MA & Niemann, J 2024, '"I feel like a real chemist right now": Epistemic affect in the chemistry laboratory', Science Education.

APA

Agustian, H. Y., Gammelgaard, B., Rangkuti, M. A., & Niemann, J. (2024). "I feel like a real chemist right now": Epistemic affect in the chemistry laboratory. Manuskript afsendt til publicering.

Vancouver

Agustian HY, Gammelgaard B, Rangkuti MA, Niemann J. "I feel like a real chemist right now": Epistemic affect in the chemistry laboratory. Science Education. 2024 mar.

Author

Agustian, Hendra Y. ; Gammelgaard, Bente ; Rangkuti, Muhammad Aswin ; Niemann, Jonas. / "I feel like a real chemist right now" : Epistemic affect in the chemistry laboratory. I: Science Education. 2024.

Bibtex

@article{4d5f28292af54fbdba0fad67c2582c1e,
title = "{"}I feel like a real chemist right now{"}: Epistemic affect in the chemistry laboratory",
abstract = "This study aims to foreground the epistemic and affective character of laboratory work in higher science education by conceptualizing it as epistemic practice, in which students activate their body and mind in discursive processes of proposing, communicating, and evaluating knowledge. On this conceptualization is an emerging construct, {\textquoteleft}epistemic affect,{\textquoteright} which refers to how one feels when engaging with epistemic practices. Several methods were used to provide triangulated evidence for student learning processes and lived experiences in the chemistry laboratory. Students were observed, surveyed, and interviewed using custom protocols based on previously validated works. The empirical materials consist of audio and video recordings of students doing an experiment in analytical chemistry, verbatim transcripts of utterances and non-verbal cues, audio recordings and transcripts of focus group interviews based on excerpts of either the videos or laboratory reports, responses to a questionnaire, as well as instructional artifacts (laboratory manuals, textbooks, and reports). Key findings from the study reveal a range of epistemic emotions experienced by students, including curiosity, frustration, and joy, which are intertwined with their engagement in experimental work and exploration of scientific principles. The study also identifies affective constructs such as confidence, pride, and humility, which contribute to students{\textquoteright} identity development within the context of laboratory-related epistemic practices. These affective experiences are situated in the embodied nature of laboratory work, where failures and mistakes are common, but also serve as opportunities for learning. The research underscores the importance of recognizing and addressing the affective dimensions of learning in the chemistry laboratory. It suggests that fostering positive epistemic emotions and managing negative ones can enhance students{\textquoteright} learning experiences and engagement with science. The study calls for a more holistic approach to chemistry education that acknowledges the role of emotion in laboratory-related epistemic practices. ",
author = "Agustian, {Hendra Y.} and Bente Gammelgaard and Rangkuti, {Muhammad Aswin} and Jonas Niemann",
year = "2024",
month = mar,
language = "English",
journal = "Science Education",
issn = "0036-8326",
publisher = "JohnWiley & Sons, Inc.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - "I feel like a real chemist right now"

T2 - Epistemic affect in the chemistry laboratory

AU - Agustian, Hendra Y.

AU - Gammelgaard, Bente

AU - Rangkuti, Muhammad Aswin

AU - Niemann, Jonas

PY - 2024/3

Y1 - 2024/3

N2 - This study aims to foreground the epistemic and affective character of laboratory work in higher science education by conceptualizing it as epistemic practice, in which students activate their body and mind in discursive processes of proposing, communicating, and evaluating knowledge. On this conceptualization is an emerging construct, ‘epistemic affect,’ which refers to how one feels when engaging with epistemic practices. Several methods were used to provide triangulated evidence for student learning processes and lived experiences in the chemistry laboratory. Students were observed, surveyed, and interviewed using custom protocols based on previously validated works. The empirical materials consist of audio and video recordings of students doing an experiment in analytical chemistry, verbatim transcripts of utterances and non-verbal cues, audio recordings and transcripts of focus group interviews based on excerpts of either the videos or laboratory reports, responses to a questionnaire, as well as instructional artifacts (laboratory manuals, textbooks, and reports). Key findings from the study reveal a range of epistemic emotions experienced by students, including curiosity, frustration, and joy, which are intertwined with their engagement in experimental work and exploration of scientific principles. The study also identifies affective constructs such as confidence, pride, and humility, which contribute to students’ identity development within the context of laboratory-related epistemic practices. These affective experiences are situated in the embodied nature of laboratory work, where failures and mistakes are common, but also serve as opportunities for learning. The research underscores the importance of recognizing and addressing the affective dimensions of learning in the chemistry laboratory. It suggests that fostering positive epistemic emotions and managing negative ones can enhance students’ learning experiences and engagement with science. The study calls for a more holistic approach to chemistry education that acknowledges the role of emotion in laboratory-related epistemic practices.

AB - This study aims to foreground the epistemic and affective character of laboratory work in higher science education by conceptualizing it as epistemic practice, in which students activate their body and mind in discursive processes of proposing, communicating, and evaluating knowledge. On this conceptualization is an emerging construct, ‘epistemic affect,’ which refers to how one feels when engaging with epistemic practices. Several methods were used to provide triangulated evidence for student learning processes and lived experiences in the chemistry laboratory. Students were observed, surveyed, and interviewed using custom protocols based on previously validated works. The empirical materials consist of audio and video recordings of students doing an experiment in analytical chemistry, verbatim transcripts of utterances and non-verbal cues, audio recordings and transcripts of focus group interviews based on excerpts of either the videos or laboratory reports, responses to a questionnaire, as well as instructional artifacts (laboratory manuals, textbooks, and reports). Key findings from the study reveal a range of epistemic emotions experienced by students, including curiosity, frustration, and joy, which are intertwined with their engagement in experimental work and exploration of scientific principles. The study also identifies affective constructs such as confidence, pride, and humility, which contribute to students’ identity development within the context of laboratory-related epistemic practices. These affective experiences are situated in the embodied nature of laboratory work, where failures and mistakes are common, but also serve as opportunities for learning. The research underscores the importance of recognizing and addressing the affective dimensions of learning in the chemistry laboratory. It suggests that fostering positive epistemic emotions and managing negative ones can enhance students’ learning experiences and engagement with science. The study calls for a more holistic approach to chemistry education that acknowledges the role of emotion in laboratory-related epistemic practices.

M3 - Journal article

JO - Science Education

JF - Science Education

SN - 0036-8326

ER -

ID: 343237304