Implementation Research in Mathematics Education: A Systematic Mapping Review.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Implementation Research in Mathematics Education : A Systematic Mapping Review. / Ahl, Linda Marie; Helenius, Ola; Sánchez Arguilar, Mario; Jankvist, Uffe Thomas; Misfeldt, Morten; Prytz , Johan.

In: Implementation and Replication Studies in Mathematics Education, Vol. 3(2023), No. 2, 2023, p. 135-199.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Ahl, LM, Helenius, O, Sánchez Arguilar, M, Jankvist, UT, Misfeldt, M & Prytz , J 2023, 'Implementation Research in Mathematics Education: A Systematic Mapping Review.', Implementation and Replication Studies in Mathematics Education, vol. 3(2023), no. 2, pp. 135-199. https://doi.org/10.1163/26670127-bja10015

APA

Ahl, L. M., Helenius, O., Sánchez Arguilar, M., Jankvist, U. T., Misfeldt, M., & Prytz , J. (2023). Implementation Research in Mathematics Education: A Systematic Mapping Review. Implementation and Replication Studies in Mathematics Education, 3(2023)(2), 135-199. https://doi.org/10.1163/26670127-bja10015

Vancouver

Ahl LM, Helenius O, Sánchez Arguilar M, Jankvist UT, Misfeldt M, Prytz J. Implementation Research in Mathematics Education: A Systematic Mapping Review. Implementation and Replication Studies in Mathematics Education. 2023;3(2023)(2):135-199. https://doi.org/10.1163/26670127-bja10015

Author

Ahl, Linda Marie ; Helenius, Ola ; Sánchez Arguilar, Mario ; Jankvist, Uffe Thomas ; Misfeldt, Morten ; Prytz , Johan. / Implementation Research in Mathematics Education : A Systematic Mapping Review. In: Implementation and Replication Studies in Mathematics Education. 2023 ; Vol. 3(2023), No. 2. pp. 135-199.

Bibtex

@article{a6121adb0e794688a7dc896f03464b7f,
title = "Implementation Research in Mathematics Education: A Systematic Mapping Review.",
abstract = "We present the results of a systematic literature review of research articles that selfidentify as describing the implementation of innovations from mathematics education research in educational practice. We classified 103 articles according to study type, the type of teaching/learning phenomenon the implementation targeted, and whether the innovation carrier was a curriculum reform, professional development, or a curriculum resource. We found that interest in implementation research increased from a modest number of published studies prior to 2003 to a peak in 2021. Other results highlight that projects that targeted teaching in line with the U.S. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics process standards were dominant when curricular reform acted as a carrier. Planning and design aspects of such projects were rarely reported, and projects were rarely discussed theoretically. Instead, such projects were commonly researched by studying teachers{\textquoteright} reform enactment. We discuss the consequences of this imbalance.",
author = "Ahl, {Linda Marie} and Ola Helenius and {S{\'a}nchez Arguilar}, Mario and Jankvist, {Uffe Thomas} and Morten Misfeldt and Johan Prytz",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1163/26670127-bja10015",
language = "English",
volume = "3(2023)",
pages = "135--199",
journal = "Implementation and Replication Studies in Mathematics Education",
issn = "2667-0127",
publisher = "Brill",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implementation Research in Mathematics Education

T2 - A Systematic Mapping Review.

AU - Ahl, Linda Marie

AU - Helenius, Ola

AU - Sánchez Arguilar, Mario

AU - Jankvist, Uffe Thomas

AU - Misfeldt, Morten

AU - Prytz , Johan

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - We present the results of a systematic literature review of research articles that selfidentify as describing the implementation of innovations from mathematics education research in educational practice. We classified 103 articles according to study type, the type of teaching/learning phenomenon the implementation targeted, and whether the innovation carrier was a curriculum reform, professional development, or a curriculum resource. We found that interest in implementation research increased from a modest number of published studies prior to 2003 to a peak in 2021. Other results highlight that projects that targeted teaching in line with the U.S. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics process standards were dominant when curricular reform acted as a carrier. Planning and design aspects of such projects were rarely reported, and projects were rarely discussed theoretically. Instead, such projects were commonly researched by studying teachers’ reform enactment. We discuss the consequences of this imbalance.

AB - We present the results of a systematic literature review of research articles that selfidentify as describing the implementation of innovations from mathematics education research in educational practice. We classified 103 articles according to study type, the type of teaching/learning phenomenon the implementation targeted, and whether the innovation carrier was a curriculum reform, professional development, or a curriculum resource. We found that interest in implementation research increased from a modest number of published studies prior to 2003 to a peak in 2021. Other results highlight that projects that targeted teaching in line with the U.S. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics process standards were dominant when curricular reform acted as a carrier. Planning and design aspects of such projects were rarely reported, and projects were rarely discussed theoretically. Instead, such projects were commonly researched by studying teachers’ reform enactment. We discuss the consequences of this imbalance.

U2 - 10.1163/26670127-bja10015

DO - 10.1163/26670127-bja10015

M3 - Journal article

VL - 3(2023)

SP - 135

EP - 199

JO - Implementation and Replication Studies in Mathematics Education

JF - Implementation and Replication Studies in Mathematics Education

SN - 2667-0127

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 380109376