Metaimagining and Embodied Conceptions of Spacetime

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Metaimagining and Embodied Conceptions of Spacetime. / Steier, Rolf; Kersting, Magdalena.

In: Cognition and Instruction, Vol. 37, No. 2, 2019, p. 145-168.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Steier, R & Kersting, M 2019, 'Metaimagining and Embodied Conceptions of Spacetime', Cognition and Instruction, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 145-168. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2019.1580711

APA

Steier, R., & Kersting, M. (2019). Metaimagining and Embodied Conceptions of Spacetime. Cognition and Instruction, 37(2), 145-168. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2019.1580711

Vancouver

Steier R, Kersting M. Metaimagining and Embodied Conceptions of Spacetime. Cognition and Instruction. 2019;37(2):145-168. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2019.1580711

Author

Steier, Rolf ; Kersting, Magdalena. / Metaimagining and Embodied Conceptions of Spacetime. In: Cognition and Instruction. 2019 ; Vol. 37, No. 2. pp. 145-168.

Bibtex

@article{7307a2fbdf6b40a78e4234be2f77586a,
title = "Metaimagining and Embodied Conceptions of Spacetime",
abstract = "Though we live in a 4-dimensional universe, our minds and bodies are not particularly good at perceiving and depicting 4 dimensions. This study contributes to our understanding of collaboration with abstract concepts by examining particular activities where bodily and experiential understandings may conflict with the conceptual domain. Specifically, upper secondary physics classrooms studying Einstein{\textquoteright}s general theory of relativity are taken as a setting to identify the representational practices and conceptual challenges that arise when learners attempt to make meaning with, and express conflicting notions of, space and time. To unpack these challenges, we draw on the concept of imagination and on theoretical perspectives that treat imagining as a social activity. We also present the concept of metaimagining to characterize layered processes in which learners attend to and manage shifts between their own imaginative activities. This concept is illustrated through a detailed analysis of an extended conversation between 2 upper secondary physics students working with general relativity and spacetime. The students perform a diverse set of imaginative activities that are strongly tied to communicative, cognitive, and bodily action. We also show how the unique domain of general relativity presents particular challenges to student meaning making of abstract concepts which in turn prompt metaimagining. Based on our analysis, we offer recommendations to improve instructional practices in general relativity and argue for the consideration of imagining as a transdisciplinary competency in math and science education.",
author = "Rolf Steier and Magdalena Kersting",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1080/07370008.2019.1580711",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "145--168",
journal = "Cognition and Instruction",
issn = "0737-0008",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Metaimagining and Embodied Conceptions of Spacetime

AU - Steier, Rolf

AU - Kersting, Magdalena

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Though we live in a 4-dimensional universe, our minds and bodies are not particularly good at perceiving and depicting 4 dimensions. This study contributes to our understanding of collaboration with abstract concepts by examining particular activities where bodily and experiential understandings may conflict with the conceptual domain. Specifically, upper secondary physics classrooms studying Einstein’s general theory of relativity are taken as a setting to identify the representational practices and conceptual challenges that arise when learners attempt to make meaning with, and express conflicting notions of, space and time. To unpack these challenges, we draw on the concept of imagination and on theoretical perspectives that treat imagining as a social activity. We also present the concept of metaimagining to characterize layered processes in which learners attend to and manage shifts between their own imaginative activities. This concept is illustrated through a detailed analysis of an extended conversation between 2 upper secondary physics students working with general relativity and spacetime. The students perform a diverse set of imaginative activities that are strongly tied to communicative, cognitive, and bodily action. We also show how the unique domain of general relativity presents particular challenges to student meaning making of abstract concepts which in turn prompt metaimagining. Based on our analysis, we offer recommendations to improve instructional practices in general relativity and argue for the consideration of imagining as a transdisciplinary competency in math and science education.

AB - Though we live in a 4-dimensional universe, our minds and bodies are not particularly good at perceiving and depicting 4 dimensions. This study contributes to our understanding of collaboration with abstract concepts by examining particular activities where bodily and experiential understandings may conflict with the conceptual domain. Specifically, upper secondary physics classrooms studying Einstein’s general theory of relativity are taken as a setting to identify the representational practices and conceptual challenges that arise when learners attempt to make meaning with, and express conflicting notions of, space and time. To unpack these challenges, we draw on the concept of imagination and on theoretical perspectives that treat imagining as a social activity. We also present the concept of metaimagining to characterize layered processes in which learners attend to and manage shifts between their own imaginative activities. This concept is illustrated through a detailed analysis of an extended conversation between 2 upper secondary physics students working with general relativity and spacetime. The students perform a diverse set of imaginative activities that are strongly tied to communicative, cognitive, and bodily action. We also show how the unique domain of general relativity presents particular challenges to student meaning making of abstract concepts which in turn prompt metaimagining. Based on our analysis, we offer recommendations to improve instructional practices in general relativity and argue for the consideration of imagining as a transdisciplinary competency in math and science education.

U2 - 10.1080/07370008.2019.1580711

DO - 10.1080/07370008.2019.1580711

M3 - Journal article

VL - 37

SP - 145

EP - 168

JO - Cognition and Instruction

JF - Cognition and Instruction

SN - 0737-0008

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 301450435