Networks identify productive forum discussions

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Networks identify productive forum discussions. / Traxler, Adrienne; Gavrin, A.; Lindell, Rebecca.

In: Physical Review Physics Education Research, Vol. 14, No. 2, 020107, 2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Traxler, A, Gavrin, A & Lindell, R 2018, 'Networks identify productive forum discussions', Physical Review Physics Education Research, vol. 14, no. 2, 020107. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevphyseducres.14.020107

APA

Traxler, A., Gavrin, A., & Lindell, R. (2018). Networks identify productive forum discussions. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(2), [020107]. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevphyseducres.14.020107

Vancouver

Traxler A, Gavrin A, Lindell R. Networks identify productive forum discussions. Physical Review Physics Education Research. 2018;14(2). 020107. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevphyseducres.14.020107

Author

Traxler, Adrienne ; Gavrin, A. ; Lindell, Rebecca. / Networks identify productive forum discussions. In: Physical Review Physics Education Research. 2018 ; Vol. 14, No. 2.

Bibtex

@article{c577736dc624475592254224d050df0d,
title = "Networks identify productive forum discussions",
abstract = "Discussion forums provide a channel for students to engage with peers and course material outside of class, accessible even to commuter and nontraditional populations. Forums can build classroom community and aid learning, but students do not always take up these tools. We use network analysis to compare three semesters of forum logs from an introductory calculus-based physics course. The networks show dense structures of collaboration that differ significantly between semesters, even though aggregate participation statistics remain steady. After characterizing network structure for each semester, we correlate students{\textquoteright} centrality—a numeric measure of network position—with final course grade. Finally, we use a backbone extraction procedure to clean up “noise” in the network and clarify centrality-grade correlations. We find that more central network positions are positively linked with course success in the two semesters with denser forum networks. Centrality is a more reliable indicator of grade than non-network measures such as postcount. Backbone extraction destroys these correlations, suggesting that the noise is in fact signal and further analysis of the discussion transcripts is required.",
author = "Adrienne Traxler and A. Gavrin and Rebecca Lindell",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1103/physrevphyseducres.14.020107",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
journal = "Physical Review Physics Education Research",
issn = "2469-9896",
publisher = "American Physical Society",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Networks identify productive forum discussions

AU - Traxler, Adrienne

AU - Gavrin, A.

AU - Lindell, Rebecca

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Discussion forums provide a channel for students to engage with peers and course material outside of class, accessible even to commuter and nontraditional populations. Forums can build classroom community and aid learning, but students do not always take up these tools. We use network analysis to compare three semesters of forum logs from an introductory calculus-based physics course. The networks show dense structures of collaboration that differ significantly between semesters, even though aggregate participation statistics remain steady. After characterizing network structure for each semester, we correlate students’ centrality—a numeric measure of network position—with final course grade. Finally, we use a backbone extraction procedure to clean up “noise” in the network and clarify centrality-grade correlations. We find that more central network positions are positively linked with course success in the two semesters with denser forum networks. Centrality is a more reliable indicator of grade than non-network measures such as postcount. Backbone extraction destroys these correlations, suggesting that the noise is in fact signal and further analysis of the discussion transcripts is required.

AB - Discussion forums provide a channel for students to engage with peers and course material outside of class, accessible even to commuter and nontraditional populations. Forums can build classroom community and aid learning, but students do not always take up these tools. We use network analysis to compare three semesters of forum logs from an introductory calculus-based physics course. The networks show dense structures of collaboration that differ significantly between semesters, even though aggregate participation statistics remain steady. After characterizing network structure for each semester, we correlate students’ centrality—a numeric measure of network position—with final course grade. Finally, we use a backbone extraction procedure to clean up “noise” in the network and clarify centrality-grade correlations. We find that more central network positions are positively linked with course success in the two semesters with denser forum networks. Centrality is a more reliable indicator of grade than non-network measures such as postcount. Backbone extraction destroys these correlations, suggesting that the noise is in fact signal and further analysis of the discussion transcripts is required.

U2 - 10.1103/physrevphyseducres.14.020107

DO - 10.1103/physrevphyseducres.14.020107

M3 - Journal article

VL - 14

JO - Physical Review Physics Education Research

JF - Physical Review Physics Education Research

SN - 2469-9896

IS - 2

M1 - 020107

ER -

ID: 332625092