Quod erat demonstrandum: Understanding and Explaining Equations in Physics Teacher Education

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Quod erat demonstrandum : Understanding and Explaining Equations in Physics Teacher Education. / Avelar Sotomaior Karam, Ricardo; Krey, Olaf.

In: Science & Education, Vol. 24, No. 5, 09.02.2015, p. 661-698.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Avelar Sotomaior Karam, R & Krey, O 2015, 'Quod erat demonstrandum: Understanding and Explaining Equations in Physics Teacher Education', Science & Education, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 661-698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-015-9743-0

APA

Avelar Sotomaior Karam, R., & Krey, O. (2015). Quod erat demonstrandum: Understanding and Explaining Equations in Physics Teacher Education. Science & Education, 24(5), 661-698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-015-9743-0

Vancouver

Avelar Sotomaior Karam R, Krey O. Quod erat demonstrandum: Understanding and Explaining Equations in Physics Teacher Education. Science & Education. 2015 Feb 9;24(5):661-698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-015-9743-0

Author

Avelar Sotomaior Karam, Ricardo ; Krey, Olaf. / Quod erat demonstrandum : Understanding and Explaining Equations in Physics Teacher Education. In: Science & Education. 2015 ; Vol. 24, No. 5. pp. 661-698.

Bibtex

@article{5b449dad628c4d4796d03f100008407c,
title = "Quod erat demonstrandum: Understanding and Explaining Equations in Physics Teacher Education",
abstract = "In physics education, equations are commonly seen as calculation tools to solveproblems or as concise descriptions of experimental regularities. In physical science, however, equations often play a much more important role associated with the formulation of theories to provide explanations for physical phenomena. In order to overcome this inconsistency, one crucial step is to improve physics teacher education. In this work, we describe the structure of a course that was given to physics teacher students at the end of their master{\textquoteright}s degree in two European universities. The course had two main goals: (1) To investigate the complex interplay between physics and mathematics from a historical and philosophical perspective and (2) To expand students{\textquoteright} repertoire of explanations regarding possible ways to derive certain school-relevant equations. A qualitative analysis on a case study basis was conducted to investigate the learning outcomes of the course. Here, we focus on the comparativeanalysis of two students who had considerably different views of the math-physicsinterplay in the beginning of the course. Our general results point to important changes on some of the students{\textquoteright} views on the role of mathematics in physics, an increase in the participants{\textquoteright} awareness of the difficulties faced by learners to understand physics equations and a broadening in the students{\textquoteright} repertoire to answer {\textquoteleft}{\textquoteleft}Why?{\textquoteright}{\textquoteright} questions formulated to equations. Based on this analysis, further implications for physics teacher education are derived.",
author = "{Avelar Sotomaior Karam}, Ricardo and Olaf Krey",
year = "2015",
month = feb,
day = "9",
doi = "10.1007/s11191-015-9743-0",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "661--698",
journal = "Science & Education",
issn = "0926-7220",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quod erat demonstrandum

T2 - Understanding and Explaining Equations in Physics Teacher Education

AU - Avelar Sotomaior Karam, Ricardo

AU - Krey, Olaf

PY - 2015/2/9

Y1 - 2015/2/9

N2 - In physics education, equations are commonly seen as calculation tools to solveproblems or as concise descriptions of experimental regularities. In physical science, however, equations often play a much more important role associated with the formulation of theories to provide explanations for physical phenomena. In order to overcome this inconsistency, one crucial step is to improve physics teacher education. In this work, we describe the structure of a course that was given to physics teacher students at the end of their master’s degree in two European universities. The course had two main goals: (1) To investigate the complex interplay between physics and mathematics from a historical and philosophical perspective and (2) To expand students’ repertoire of explanations regarding possible ways to derive certain school-relevant equations. A qualitative analysis on a case study basis was conducted to investigate the learning outcomes of the course. Here, we focus on the comparativeanalysis of two students who had considerably different views of the math-physicsinterplay in the beginning of the course. Our general results point to important changes on some of the students’ views on the role of mathematics in physics, an increase in the participants’ awareness of the difficulties faced by learners to understand physics equations and a broadening in the students’ repertoire to answer ‘‘Why?’’ questions formulated to equations. Based on this analysis, further implications for physics teacher education are derived.

AB - In physics education, equations are commonly seen as calculation tools to solveproblems or as concise descriptions of experimental regularities. In physical science, however, equations often play a much more important role associated with the formulation of theories to provide explanations for physical phenomena. In order to overcome this inconsistency, one crucial step is to improve physics teacher education. In this work, we describe the structure of a course that was given to physics teacher students at the end of their master’s degree in two European universities. The course had two main goals: (1) To investigate the complex interplay between physics and mathematics from a historical and philosophical perspective and (2) To expand students’ repertoire of explanations regarding possible ways to derive certain school-relevant equations. A qualitative analysis on a case study basis was conducted to investigate the learning outcomes of the course. Here, we focus on the comparativeanalysis of two students who had considerably different views of the math-physicsinterplay in the beginning of the course. Our general results point to important changes on some of the students’ views on the role of mathematics in physics, an increase in the participants’ awareness of the difficulties faced by learners to understand physics equations and a broadening in the students’ repertoire to answer ‘‘Why?’’ questions formulated to equations. Based on this analysis, further implications for physics teacher education are derived.

U2 - 10.1007/s11191-015-9743-0

DO - 10.1007/s11191-015-9743-0

M3 - Journal article

VL - 24

SP - 661

EP - 698

JO - Science & Education

JF - Science & Education

SN - 0926-7220

IS - 5

ER -

ID: 131069196