TY - JOUR

T1 - Systems Science and the Art of Interdisciplinary Integration

AU - Green, Sara

AU - Andersen, Hanne

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Systems sciences address issues that cross-cut any single discipline and benefit from the synergy of combining several approaches. But interdisciplinary integration can be challenging to achieve in practice. Scientists with different disciplinary backgrounds often have different views on what count as good data, good evidence, a good model, or a good explanation. Accordingly, several scholars have reported on challenges encountered in interdisciplinary settings. This chapter outlines how some of the challenges play out in systems biology where disciplinary ideals and domain specific practices sometime collide. We focus on tensions arising due to differences in epistemic standards between modellers with a background in physics or systems engineering, on one hand, and experimenters with a background in molecular biology on the other. We propose that part of the problem of interdisciplinary integration can be understood as the result of unfounded “disciplinary imperialism” on both sides, in which standards from one discipline are uncritically applied to new domains without recognition of other valid or complementary perspectives. We suggest that addressing and explicating the disciplinary background for the different views can help facilitate interdisciplinary collaboration in science as well as serve to improve science education.

AB - Systems sciences address issues that cross-cut any single discipline and benefit from the synergy of combining several approaches. But interdisciplinary integration can be challenging to achieve in practice. Scientists with different disciplinary backgrounds often have different views on what count as good data, good evidence, a good model, or a good explanation. Accordingly, several scholars have reported on challenges encountered in interdisciplinary settings. This chapter outlines how some of the challenges play out in systems biology where disciplinary ideals and domain specific practices sometime collide. We focus on tensions arising due to differences in epistemic standards between modellers with a background in physics or systems engineering, on one hand, and experimenters with a background in molecular biology on the other. We propose that part of the problem of interdisciplinary integration can be understood as the result of unfounded “disciplinary imperialism” on both sides, in which standards from one discipline are uncritically applied to new domains without recognition of other valid or complementary perspectives. We suggest that addressing and explicating the disciplinary background for the different views can help facilitate interdisciplinary collaboration in science as well as serve to improve science education.

U2 - 10.1002/sres.2633

DO - 10.1002/sres.2633

M3 - Journal article

VL - 36

SP - 727

EP - 743

JO - Systems Research

JF - Systems Research

SN - 1092-7026

IS - 5

ER -