Characterizing active learning environments in physics using network analysis and classroom observations

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Characterizing active learning environments in physics using network analysis and classroom observations. / Commeford, Kelley; Brewe, Eric; Traxler, Adrienne.

I: Physical Review Physics Education Research, Bind 17, 020136, 2021.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Commeford, K, Brewe, E & Traxler, A 2021, 'Characterizing active learning environments in physics using network analysis and classroom observations', Physical Review Physics Education Research, bind 17, 020136. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.020136

APA

Commeford, K., Brewe, E., & Traxler, A. (2021). Characterizing active learning environments in physics using network analysis and classroom observations. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17, [020136]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.020136

Vancouver

Commeford K, Brewe E, Traxler A. Characterizing active learning environments in physics using network analysis and classroom observations. Physical Review Physics Education Research. 2021;17. 020136. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.020136

Author

Commeford, Kelley ; Brewe, Eric ; Traxler, Adrienne. / Characterizing active learning environments in physics using network analysis and classroom observations. I: Physical Review Physics Education Research. 2021 ; Bind 17.

Bibtex

@article{346388779edb431e8ac16618ca0b4a44,
title = "Characterizing active learning environments in physics using network analysis and classroom observations",
abstract = "This study uses social network analysis and the classroom observation protocol for undergraduate STEM (COPUS) to characterize six research-based introductory physics curricula. Peer Instruction, Modeling Instruction, ISLE, SCALE-UP, Context-Rich Problems, and Tutorials in Introductory Physics were investigated. Students in each curriculum were given a survey at the beginning and end of term, asking them to self-identify peers with whom they had meaningful interactions in class. Every curriculum showed an increase in the average number of student connections from the beginning of term to the end of term, with the largest increase occurring in Modeling Instruction, SCALE-UP, and Context-Rich Problems. Modeling Instruction was the only curriculum with a drastic change in how tightly connected the student network was. Transitivity increased for all curricula except Peer Instruction. We also spent one week per research site in the middle of the term observing courses using COPUS. From these observations, the student COPUS profiles look nearly the same for Tutorials, ISLE recitations, and Context-Rich Problems discussion sections. This is likely due to the large resolution of activities that can be coded as {"}other group activity,{"} suggesting the need for a more detailed observation instrument.",
author = "Kelley Commeford and Eric Brewe and Adrienne Traxler",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.020136",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
journal = "Physical Review Physics Education Research",
issn = "2469-9896",
publisher = "American Physical Society",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Characterizing active learning environments in physics using network analysis and classroom observations

AU - Commeford, Kelley

AU - Brewe, Eric

AU - Traxler, Adrienne

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - This study uses social network analysis and the classroom observation protocol for undergraduate STEM (COPUS) to characterize six research-based introductory physics curricula. Peer Instruction, Modeling Instruction, ISLE, SCALE-UP, Context-Rich Problems, and Tutorials in Introductory Physics were investigated. Students in each curriculum were given a survey at the beginning and end of term, asking them to self-identify peers with whom they had meaningful interactions in class. Every curriculum showed an increase in the average number of student connections from the beginning of term to the end of term, with the largest increase occurring in Modeling Instruction, SCALE-UP, and Context-Rich Problems. Modeling Instruction was the only curriculum with a drastic change in how tightly connected the student network was. Transitivity increased for all curricula except Peer Instruction. We also spent one week per research site in the middle of the term observing courses using COPUS. From these observations, the student COPUS profiles look nearly the same for Tutorials, ISLE recitations, and Context-Rich Problems discussion sections. This is likely due to the large resolution of activities that can be coded as "other group activity," suggesting the need for a more detailed observation instrument.

AB - This study uses social network analysis and the classroom observation protocol for undergraduate STEM (COPUS) to characterize six research-based introductory physics curricula. Peer Instruction, Modeling Instruction, ISLE, SCALE-UP, Context-Rich Problems, and Tutorials in Introductory Physics were investigated. Students in each curriculum were given a survey at the beginning and end of term, asking them to self-identify peers with whom they had meaningful interactions in class. Every curriculum showed an increase in the average number of student connections from the beginning of term to the end of term, with the largest increase occurring in Modeling Instruction, SCALE-UP, and Context-Rich Problems. Modeling Instruction was the only curriculum with a drastic change in how tightly connected the student network was. Transitivity increased for all curricula except Peer Instruction. We also spent one week per research site in the middle of the term observing courses using COPUS. From these observations, the student COPUS profiles look nearly the same for Tutorials, ISLE recitations, and Context-Rich Problems discussion sections. This is likely due to the large resolution of activities that can be coded as "other group activity," suggesting the need for a more detailed observation instrument.

U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.020136

DO - 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.020136

M3 - Journal article

VL - 17

JO - Physical Review Physics Education Research

JF - Physical Review Physics Education Research

SN - 2469-9896

M1 - 020136

ER -

ID: 332195579