Reasons for not/choosing chemistry: Why advanced level chemistry students in England do/not pursue chemistry undergraduate degrees

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Dokumenter

  • Fulltext

    Forlagets udgivne version, 3,76 MB, PDF-dokument

There are international concerns about decreasing rates of chemistry degree enrolment. This article seeks to understand students' reasons for not/choosing to pursue a chemistry degree, drawing on (i) open-ended survey responses from a sample of 506 students in England aged 21–22 who had studied advanced level (“A level”) chemistry at age 18 (as either a full A level or a half “AS” level) and had either chosen (n = 70) or not chosen (n = 436) to pursue undergraduate chemistry and (ii) 185 interviews conducted with a subsample of 18 young people who had been longitudinally tracked from age 10 to 22 (with 17 of their parents) who took advanced level chemistry and then either did (n = 5), or did not (n = 13) go on to study for a chemistry degree. Analysis revealed four key reasons for not/choosing chemistry that were present to varying extents in both the quantitative and qualitative data (relative interest, connection and options; experiences of chemistry A level; feeling “not/clever enough”; and views of chemistry jobs). Four additional factors were predominantly found in the qualitative data (associations of chemistry with masculinity; encouragement from a significant adult; views of higher education; and chemistry work experience/outreach). Applying a sociological lens, we suggest that not/choosing chemistry was a relational process, produced through interactions of habitus, capital, and field. We identify conceptual and methodological implications and extrapolate reasons why chemistry degree enrolments may be declining, offering suggestions for how chemistry education might further support participation.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of Research in Science Teaching
Vol/bind60
Udgave nummer5
Sider (fra-til)978-1013
ISSN0022-4308
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2023

Bibliografisk note

Funding Information:
We draw on a convergent parallel, mixed methods study, the ASPIRES project, a 13‐year research project tracking young people's educational and career trajectories from age 10 to 23, funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC). The wider study involves (i) repeated cross‐sectional surveys with a representative sample of young people from the cohort of all those in England who were born between September 1, 1998 and August 31, 1999 (with waves conducted in the final year of primary school, age 10–11, throughout secondary school, at ages 12–13, 13–14, 15–16, 17–18) and the most recent wave, reported in this article, at age 21–22 and (ii) longitudinal interviews with a sample of 50 young people and 34 of their parents, conducted at the same time points. In this article, we focus only on data from young people in the sample who studied advanced level chemistry.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of National Association for Research in Science Teaching.

Antal downloads er baseret på statistik fra Google Scholar og www.ku.dk


Ingen data tilgængelig

ID: 327695606