Teaching scientific creativity through philosophy of science

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Teaching scientific creativity through philosophy of science. / Jaksland, Rasmus.

I: European Journal for Philosophy of Science, Bind 11, Nr. 4, 110, 2021.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Jaksland, R 2021, 'Teaching scientific creativity through philosophy of science', European Journal for Philosophy of Science, bind 11, nr. 4, 110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-021-00427-9

APA

Jaksland, R. (2021). Teaching scientific creativity through philosophy of science. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 11(4), [110]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-021-00427-9

Vancouver

Jaksland R. Teaching scientific creativity through philosophy of science. European Journal for Philosophy of Science. 2021;11(4). 110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-021-00427-9

Author

Jaksland, Rasmus. / Teaching scientific creativity through philosophy of science. I: European Journal for Philosophy of Science. 2021 ; Bind 11, Nr. 4.

Bibtex

@article{f205e10f71c544a2b911c07ea8d784cb,
title = "Teaching scientific creativity through philosophy of science",
abstract = "There is a demand to nurture scientific creativity in science education. This paper proposes that the relevant conceptual infrastructure with which to teach scientific creativity is often already included in philosophy of science courses, even those that do not cover scientific creativity explicitly. More precisely, it is shown how paradigm theory can serve as a framework with which to introduce the differences between combinational, exploratory, and transformational creativity in science. Moreover, the types of components given in Kuhn{\textquoteright}s disciplinary matrix are argued to indicate a further subdivision within transformational creativity that makes explicit that this most radical type of creativity that aims to go beyond and thus to transform the current paradigm can take many different directions. More generally, it is argued that there are several synergies between the topic of scientific creativity and paradigm theory that can be utilized in most philosophy of science courses at relative ease. Doing so should promote the understanding of scientific creativity among students, provide another way to signify the relevance of paradigm theory, and more strategically be a way of reinforcing the place of philosophy of science in science education.",
keywords = "Context of discovery, Creativity, Paradigm theory, Philosophy of science, Thomas Kuhn, Transformational creativity",
author = "Rasmus Jaksland",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021, The Author(s).",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1007/s13194-021-00427-9",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
journal = "European Journal for Philosophy of Science",
issn = "1879-4912",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Teaching scientific creativity through philosophy of science

AU - Jaksland, Rasmus

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021, The Author(s).

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - There is a demand to nurture scientific creativity in science education. This paper proposes that the relevant conceptual infrastructure with which to teach scientific creativity is often already included in philosophy of science courses, even those that do not cover scientific creativity explicitly. More precisely, it is shown how paradigm theory can serve as a framework with which to introduce the differences between combinational, exploratory, and transformational creativity in science. Moreover, the types of components given in Kuhn’s disciplinary matrix are argued to indicate a further subdivision within transformational creativity that makes explicit that this most radical type of creativity that aims to go beyond and thus to transform the current paradigm can take many different directions. More generally, it is argued that there are several synergies between the topic of scientific creativity and paradigm theory that can be utilized in most philosophy of science courses at relative ease. Doing so should promote the understanding of scientific creativity among students, provide another way to signify the relevance of paradigm theory, and more strategically be a way of reinforcing the place of philosophy of science in science education.

AB - There is a demand to nurture scientific creativity in science education. This paper proposes that the relevant conceptual infrastructure with which to teach scientific creativity is often already included in philosophy of science courses, even those that do not cover scientific creativity explicitly. More precisely, it is shown how paradigm theory can serve as a framework with which to introduce the differences between combinational, exploratory, and transformational creativity in science. Moreover, the types of components given in Kuhn’s disciplinary matrix are argued to indicate a further subdivision within transformational creativity that makes explicit that this most radical type of creativity that aims to go beyond and thus to transform the current paradigm can take many different directions. More generally, it is argued that there are several synergies between the topic of scientific creativity and paradigm theory that can be utilized in most philosophy of science courses at relative ease. Doing so should promote the understanding of scientific creativity among students, provide another way to signify the relevance of paradigm theory, and more strategically be a way of reinforcing the place of philosophy of science in science education.

KW - Context of discovery

KW - Creativity

KW - Paradigm theory

KW - Philosophy of science

KW - Thomas Kuhn

KW - Transformational creativity

U2 - 10.1007/s13194-021-00427-9

DO - 10.1007/s13194-021-00427-9

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85119957451

VL - 11

JO - European Journal for Philosophy of Science

JF - European Journal for Philosophy of Science

SN - 1879-4912

IS - 4

M1 - 110

ER -

ID: 339998425