The Logic in Philosophy of Science

Institut for Naturfagenes Didaktik

Publikation: Bog/antologi/afhandling/rapport › Bog › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

The Logic in Philosophy of Science. / Halvorson, Hans.

Cambridge University Press, 2019. 296 s.

Publikation: Bog/antologi/afhandling/rapport › Bog › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Halvorson, H 2019, The Logic in Philosophy of Science. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316275603

APA

Halvorson, H. (2019). The Logic in Philosophy of Science. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316275603

Vancouver

Halvorson H. The Logic in Philosophy of Science. Cambridge University Press, 2019. 296 s. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316275603

Author

Halvorson, Hans. / The Logic in Philosophy of Science. Cambridge University Press, 2019. 296 s.

Bibtex

@book{eaf1e0f1e428403d9fdd16bb5d870949,

title = "The Logic in Philosophy of Science",

abstract = "Major figures of twentieth-century philosophy were enthralled by the revolution in formal logic, and many of their arguments are based on novel mathematical discoveries. Hilary Putnam claimed that the L{\"o}wenheim-Skolem theorem refutes the existence of an objective, observer-independent world; Bas van Fraassen claimed that arguments against empiricism in philosophy of science are ineffective against a semantic approach to scientific theories; W. v. O. Quine claimed that the distinction between analytic and synthetic truths is trivialized by the fact that any theory can be reduced to one in which all truths are analytic. This book dissects these and other arguments through in-depth investigation of the mathematical facts undergirding them. It presents a systematic, mathematically rigorous account of the key notions arising from such debates, including theory, equivalence, translation, reduction, and model. The result is a far-reaching reconceptualization of the role of formal methods in answering philosophical questions.",

author = "Hans Halvorson",

year = "2019",

doi = "10.1017/9781316275603",

language = "English",

isbn = "9781107110991",

publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

address = "United Kingdom",

}

RIS

TY - BOOK

T1 - The Logic in Philosophy of Science

AU - Halvorson, Hans

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Major figures of twentieth-century philosophy were enthralled by the revolution in formal logic, and many of their arguments are based on novel mathematical discoveries. Hilary Putnam claimed that the Löwenheim-Skolem theorem refutes the existence of an objective, observer-independent world; Bas van Fraassen claimed that arguments against empiricism in philosophy of science are ineffective against a semantic approach to scientific theories; W. v. O. Quine claimed that the distinction between analytic and synthetic truths is trivialized by the fact that any theory can be reduced to one in which all truths are analytic. This book dissects these and other arguments through in-depth investigation of the mathematical facts undergirding them. It presents a systematic, mathematically rigorous account of the key notions arising from such debates, including theory, equivalence, translation, reduction, and model. The result is a far-reaching reconceptualization of the role of formal methods in answering philosophical questions.

AB - Major figures of twentieth-century philosophy were enthralled by the revolution in formal logic, and many of their arguments are based on novel mathematical discoveries. Hilary Putnam claimed that the Löwenheim-Skolem theorem refutes the existence of an objective, observer-independent world; Bas van Fraassen claimed that arguments against empiricism in philosophy of science are ineffective against a semantic approach to scientific theories; W. v. O. Quine claimed that the distinction between analytic and synthetic truths is trivialized by the fact that any theory can be reduced to one in which all truths are analytic. This book dissects these and other arguments through in-depth investigation of the mathematical facts undergirding them. It presents a systematic, mathematically rigorous account of the key notions arising from such debates, including theory, equivalence, translation, reduction, and model. The result is a far-reaching reconceptualization of the role of formal methods in answering philosophical questions.

U2 - 10.1017/9781316275603

DO - 10.1017/9781316275603

M3 - Book

AN - SCOPUS:85053429101

SN - 9781107110991

BT - The Logic in Philosophy of Science

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -

ID: 289118828